Buffalo Law Review Archive

Independent historical archive (2006–2018). For current issues of the Buffalo Law Review, visit digitalcommons.law.buffalo.edu/buffalolawreview.

Background (Fixed-Cost) Avoidance-Choices, Foreground (Variable-Cost) Avoidance-Choices, and the Economically Efficient Approach for Courts to Take in Marine-Salvage Cases: A Positive Analysis and Related Critique of Landes and Posner’s Classic Study

Richard S. Markovits

59 Buff. L. Rev. 57 (2011)

This article, Background (Fixed-Cost) Avoidance-Choices, Foreground (Variable-Cost) Avoidance-Choices, and the Economically Efficient Approach for Courts to Take in Marine-Salvage Cases: A Positive Analysis and Related Critique of Landes and Posner’s Classic Study by Richard S. Markovits, appeared in Volume 59, Issue 1 of the Buffalo Law Review in 2011.

A summary of this article is not yet available in this archive. Download the PDF below to read the full text.

Read the full article (PDF) Original filename: Markovits.pdf

How to cite

Richard S. Markovits, Background (Fixed-Cost) Avoidance-Choices, Foreground (Variable-Cost) Avoidance-Choices, and the Economically Efficient Approach for Courts to Take in Marine-Salvage Cases: A Positive Analysis and Related Critique of Landes and Posner’s Classic Study, 59 Buff. L. Rev. 57 (2011).