The Validity of Restraints on Alienation in an Oil and Gas Lease
64 Buff. L. Rev. 305 (2016)
Oil and gas leases increasingly contain clauses restricting a company's ability to transfer lease rights to third parties, but courts have reached conflicting conclusions about whether such restraints on alienation are enforceable. Meier and Ryan examine the difficulty of applying traditional contract and property law frameworks to the unique oil and gas lease relationship, which straddles contract and property law. The authors argue that courts should not mechanically apply contract or property labels to resolve enforceability, as neither framework adequately addresses the practical realities of the landowner-operator relationship. Contract law typically enforces restrictions on transfer of contractual duties, while property law treats restraints on alienability more skeptically, particularly those on fee interests. In the oil and gas context, transfer restrictions serve important functions in preventing unwanted operators and protecting landowner interests. The authors argue that alienation restraints in mineral leases should generally be enforced when the landowner explicitly bargained for protective transfer clauses, and that such enforcement will not interfere with industry functioning.
Keywords: oil and gas lease · restraints on alienation · transfer restrictions · mineral rights · leaseholder assignment
How to cite
Luke Meier & Rory Ryan, The Validity of Restraints on Alienation in an Oil and Gas Lease, 64 Buff. L. Rev. 305 (2016).