Comment, How the Rise of the Daily Fantasy Sports Industry Can Catalyze the Liberalization of Sports Betting Policies in the United States
66 Buff. L. Rev. 715 (2018)
Daily fantasy sports—particularly FanDuel and DraftKings—operated in a legal gray area for years by characterizing themselves as games of skill rather than gambling, distinguishing them from illegal online gambling operations. The daily fantasy industry marketed continuously as skill-based competition while privately pitching investors with pitches emphasizing similarities to traditional gambling. By 2015, after explosive growth into billion-dollar enterprises, state attorneys general began enforcement action. The comment argues that the industry's rise paradoxically creates momentum for broader sports betting liberalization nationwide. FanDuel and DraftKings secured billion-dollar valuations and high-profile sponsorships with major sports leagues despite operating under legal uncertainty, exuding confidence in their legitimacy. This brash confidence and the industry's enormous commercial success, combined with major sports franchise owners' equity stakes in daily fantasy companies, positioned them as powerful lobbyists for liberalized betting regimes. The industry demonstrated that regulated sports wagering could coexist with professional sports; their legal reckoning catalyzed subsequent moves toward legalization across states seeking regulatory revenue and control over wagering markets.
Topics: Administrative Law · Evidence & Procedure
Keywords: daily fantasy sports · FanDuel · DraftKings · games of skill · sports gambling · New York · illegal gambling · skill versus chance
How to cite
Brendan F. Conley, Comment, How the Rise of the Daily Fantasy Sports Industry Can Catalyze the Liberalization of Sports Betting Policies in the United States, 66 Buff. L. Rev. 715 (2018).